The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000, and its proportions according to region.
The table indicates about population density over the world, and two pie charts give detailed information about the proportion of people in given regions in two periods between 1900 and 2000.
Overall, the table shows a fluctuation about the population over the world. Pie charts delineate a majority of people belonged to Asia.
In detail, the world population fluctuated substantially, rising at 1,5 billion in 1900 to nearly 2 billion in 1960. After a slight growth in 1970, experiencing a dramatic upward trend, the figure for 2 billion in 1970 compared to 6 billion in 2000.
In 2000, there was a feature point about the appearance of the Middle East and North Africa, which accounted for 6%. Although a moderate decline in 2000, the population of Asia is still the most common compared to other regions, followed that is Europe, which accounted for 54% and 14% respectively. While remaining countries: Latin America, Africa, North America, which can be grouped into a percentage between 3% and 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | Phạm Phú Trường | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Phạm Phú Trường | 82 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Phạm Phú Trường | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Phạm Phú Trường | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | hienneu98 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different season 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion 78
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- (19/09/2015) Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- As well as making money, the business also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09036144578 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76137639476 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8244964944 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187115560856 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735518853471 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599716692532 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110025583934 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555145883371 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.