Some people believe that social networking sites are not doing enough to protect users' privacy. However, others believe that it is not the responsibility of the sites; instead, users should be more careful about what they make available online.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Two days ago, I read an article about who is in charge of protecting private life on social networking sites. Some politicians state that these websites should take responsibility for providing it. However, some website designers claim that users should care about it themselves. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agree with the idea of obliging social networking sites to secure privacy.
Let us start with the reasons why some politicians argue that this sort of websites should protect confidentiality. The first reason is that they usually keep personal information in their databases. These sites can easily restrict the access to private details, such as photos and phone numbers, since they both store and grant permission in their own data centers. Another reason is that they let others browse the confidential information without alerting the owners by default. VK, for instance, leaves the information viewable on the web, which enable criminals to take advantage of against the owners, but if they made pages closed by default, users would feel protected. Therefore, after analyzing these reasons, it is clear that social networking sites should limit access to the personal data.
Nevertheless, some IT experts advocate that users should manage their personal information on their own. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, users should be entitled the right to decide what to do with their private information. People generally want to decide themselves to either open or close their front pages to the world, thereby it would be unfair, if these websites did it for them. Secondly, this type of websites often provide various safety options for users to choose from. Facebook, for example, allows people to hide their pages either partly or totally, so they can grant a limited number of people an entry to their personal life. As a result, after considering these arguments, it is obvious that people should be responsible for their privacy on social networking sites.
In conclusion, although some IT experts say that users should make a decision about the safety of their personal data, I believe that social networking sites should take measures instead of individuals for the above mentioned reasons.
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and the protection is a waste of resources To what extend do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- Your family is going to move to another town. Write a letter to the Principal of a local school asking if they will accept your son.Describe his academic achievements and scope of interests. 78
- With the development of online, there is no future for the radio.To what extent do you agree? 73
- Should the government provide people with free accommodation? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27472527473 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61941581469 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546703296703 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.380601001 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311340198913 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100720553635 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703523814748 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210646580581 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060108184337 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.