Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by Aydin94 on Thu, 10/10/2019 - 11:04

Teaching is a demanding job, and teachers ought to be aware of their vital influence on the students. I believe that pedagogues should conceal their points of view to pupils in the school. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, instructors are role models for most of the apprentices who can have an essential effect on the students’ future. Each society needs people who can think and decide efficiently with the aid of their ideas, not only by the facts they have learned from their governments. Teachers must teach the students that how they can think and ponder properly. Meanwhile, pupils should learn to recognize whether the ideas that they have seen in social media are right or not. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About five years ago, I enrolled in an American history class. During this course, my pedagogue has taught me that how heroes of this country can affect their society and people. The heroes had the power of thinking and pondering, which they had learned by practicing when they were juveniles. He has proved to us that the thinking ability of these heroes was the vital key that people followed them. Before that time, I had decided in every situation just with the aid of my parents and siblings. However, after participating for nine months in this class, I have begun to improve my pondering capability. As a result, when I started my career following my graduation, I excelled in solving new and essential issues due to the thinking power and was seen by my supervisor. Therefore, I have been successful at my workplace.

Secondly, if some students have opposite views, it may have bad results on the influence that the teacher has on students. It is vital to be considered that there are different teachers with various characteristics in schools. Some pedagogues may not tolerate enough to hear a different idea so that students may suffer just because of this simple problem. For instance, when my sister was in university, she took a programming course. She spent two months that semester working on a programming project, which she did very well. Unfortunately, she had some conflicting ideas with her teacher in some political views, which caused she got the lowest score in the class.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that pedagogues should not reveal their points of view to pupils. This is because students need to achieve the power of pondering and because it may have an bad effect on the relationship of the students and teachers.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 DHANDA 90 view
2020-01-13 naziii 76 view
2020-01-06 sarah halawani 65 view
2020-01-06 liviapabreu 66 view
2020-01-05 Somayya 76 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user Aydin94 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...er of pondering and because it may have an bad effect on the relationship of the s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85159817352 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71453794385 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0526158965 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5416666667 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0743216050711 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237768733554 0.076458572812 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026466687107 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424046941752 0.150856017488 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283895014377 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.