The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
The line graph reports about the comparison of the existence stock of various sweeteners in USA since 1966 until 2012. Overall available inventories are stable for forty six years with some fluctuation around the period.
After a short steadily, in 1966 refined cane and beet sugars fluctuated throughout the years until decreased dramatically in the end of 1986. However sugars decreased, continued by corn sweeteners with a slightly increasing around 1966 to 1986. While sugars decreased and corn sweeteners increased, availabilities of the honey and edible syrups had stabled around the years with a little fluctuation.
A slightly decreasing in the end of 2012 for refined cane and beet sugars remained reasonably stable throughout the years by a little fluctuations. Furthermore, after rose sharply then reached a new peak, the onwards of corn sweeteners declined and reached a lower level under sugars in 2012. In other case, honey and edible syrups remained reasonably stable throughout the period with a various fluctuation. Afterwards, total chart showed a significant fluctuation along the years with a highest level in 2001, closed by inconstancy then reached a highest level in the end of 2012 with 130 pound per person.
To conclude the article, various sweeteners such had stabled along the years with a dramatic fluctuation such on sugars and corn sweeteners in the end of 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | Fachri040495 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Falah1486 | 67 | view |
- Chain Food Production in US 78
- Food production in US 78
- Development in the Coastal Zone Brightsea 67
- Household budget in UK and New Zealand in 1980 and 2008 84
- Consuming junk food too much without any controlling in western is commonly biggest failure of people’s poor diet nowadays. Due to the people in UK habit for eating many convenience food, although they understand well that it is not good and be affected 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: forty-six
...ll available inventories are stable for forty six years with some fluctuation around the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...reased dramatically in the end of 1986. However sugars decreased, continued by corn swe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the years with a little fluctuation. A slightly decreasing in the end of 2012...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fluctuation'?
Suggestion: fluctuation
...stable throughout the years by a little fluctuations. Furthermore, after rose sharply then r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ficant fluctuation along the years with a highest level in 2001, closed by an inc...
^
Line 9, column 565, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... increasing and decreasing then reached a highest level in the end of 2012 with 1...
^
Line 9, column 609, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...ghest level in the end of 2012 with 130 pound per person. To conclude the articl...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and corn sweeteners in the end of 2012.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35111111111 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88524898898 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457777777778 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4061722516 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166135983048 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818106159671 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798879371117 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131353515806 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667043601477 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.