tourists and not local people are visiting museums and historical sites. why is it so and what are the ways to attract local people?
Historical places are more often crowded by travelers rather than natives. There are plenty of reasons which contribute to this phenomenon, from which some will be mentioned in the following. Also, a solution will be presented to change the situation.
First of all, museums and places similar to them charge visitors with a considerable amount of fee, which most of the time is not affordable by ordinary people living in the vicinity. For many local individuals, sightseeing is considered a luxury activity and they prefer to spend their money on other necessity of life instead such as food or clothing.
Secondly, in special dates like Nowruz, historical sites such as Persepolis are far too populated with tourists that locals try to avoid those regions altogether. It seems that people living in the same city where tourist attractions are located never get the opportunity to enjoy their magnificent beauty at peace without being disturb by foreign intruders.
Finally, people like to spend their free time to travel and leave their hometown. Hence, they rarely find spare time to visit the historical sites in their neighborhood. Moreover, they are always in their immediate reach so they would rather postpone their visit and go see places that are far away.
Different steps can be taken to encourage local people to visit their hometown historical places. First step could be lowering the entrance fee for locals or even offering free passes to top students and their families. The next step could be dedicating some hours on special occasions only to local visitors. This way they will definitely feel honored and participate in celebrations along with their community members. Lastly, it is beneficial to advertise the value of historical sites and how they might not be around for all eternity so that people come to the realization that time is of the essence. For example, lots of historical places were destroyed after earthquake in Bam. Had people known about the disaster beforehand, they would have visited the place sooner.
In conclusion, there are many problems preventing local residents from visiting their city's historical attractions as mentioned above. However, all challenges can be alleviated by spending money and some encouragements.
- Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some people believe that men and women are equal so women should be able to do any job they want and others feels that men and women are not equal and therefore there are certain jobs which are not suitable for women What is your opinion 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out being disturb by foreign intruders. Finally, people like to spend their free...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it and go see places that are far away. Different steps can be taken to encourag...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29395604396 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72489113527 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57967032967 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2055182814 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.421052632 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265786602481 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797194326403 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625894111217 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130210338199 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662837914922 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.