Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Given that watching TV is an effective channel for children to acquire knowledge, children as the audiences and learners should be encouraged to watch TV no matter they are at home or at school. While I disapprove of such statement.
Admittedly, I agree that children can learn a lot from TV programs. With different contents which could expand the scope of knowledge. For example, a documentary about rare animals, not only can children acquire knowledge about the habitat、food、behaviour and enemy of animals, but also can instill the sense of protecting them. It is conducive to push out the horizon of their knowledge. Besides, some quiz programs give children the feeling of participation which can ignite their enthusiasm for learning.
Nevertheless, I disagree that children should often watch TV. First of all, watching TV regularly is detrimental to their health. One of the direct consequences of watching TV is poor eyesight which can influence the rest of children’s life since this is difficult to cure. Moreover, if children were encouraged to watch TV regularly, they would become immersed in various TV programs, such as soap opera、talk show. They are reluctant to interact with others, resulting in lacking interpersonal skills in particular when children are at school.
In conclusion, with the help of watching TV, children can acquire comprehensive knowledge but watching TV regularly also imposes negative influence on their health and interpersonal interaction. So we should not encourage children to spend much time on watching TV.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Oliviachenlu | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Oliviachenlu | 61 | view |
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain, while others say that films also have educational value. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o matter they are at home or at school. While I disapprove of such statement. Ad...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, I disagree that children should often watch TV. First of all, watching TV regu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44897959184 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32305064 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583673469388 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7012759617 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483233579748 0.244688304435 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168942875286 0.084324248473 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137640903493 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321267479816 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118310570416 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.