leadership come naturally, no one could learn to be a leader
Since the beginning of time, leadership has been a controversial issue. Some people believe that leadership comes naturally; however, there is a substantial body of evidence claims that anyone could be trained to be a charismatic leader. From a personal perspective, both points of views are right merely to some extent. To put it in other words, although some people have a natural potential to become a leader, others could gain this skill throughout learning and practicing.
The first and foremost point, some people have a natural instinct to become a front-runner; likewise, they have the ability to control others without formal training. A vivid example of that is some children in elementary schools are dominate and have the ability to dictate their friends; hence, they could decide what they should play, where they should gather and with whom they could participate. Provided that these children have the ability to manage their friends’ mind, they could lead them. Although they are not trained to be leaders, they have the charisma to lead. Consequently, the higher the the natural extinct of leadership, the better the chance to become a leader.
However, other people who do not have a natural instinct of leadership could be trained and become leaders. Not only by putting them in a suitable environment, but also by teaching them different skills, such as articulate, potent and decisive. For instance, Adolf Hitler used to be a shy person in his youth, but throughout his life he learned many skills and nurtured his abilities to make a brutal leader. Furthermore, people could enhance their leadership ability by studying or taking relevant universities courses. Therefore, coupled with practicing, learning is another way that people could acquire knowledge and get more chance to be a leader.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, leadership is not only an internal skill, but also a skill that could be gained through training and learning. It is suggested that schools design learning activities that promote leadership skill in order to raise a generation of powerful leaders.
- tpo 34 the elephant- size dinosaur 3
- parents should spend their free time having fun with their kids or doing something related to schoolwork 73
- do you agree or disagree? educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time o cell phones, online games, and social networking website 90
- do you agree or disagree, older people should learn new things like young people do? 81
- tpo 28 Robert Peary's trip to the North Pole 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dominated'.
Suggestion: dominated
...some children in elementary schools are dominate and have the ability to dictate their f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...risma to lead. Consequently, the higher the the natural extinct of leadership, the bett...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...risma to lead. Consequently, the higher the the natural extinct of leadership, the bett...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ise a generation of powerful leaders.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27859237537 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81367257901 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530791788856 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1593226833 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293027683142 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10260222723 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088298184603 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195718925922 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806689717073 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.