The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.

The given pie charts illustrate the difference of 5 types of energy production of france, over the course 10 years starting in 1995.

Looking at the pie charts, it is clearly evident that the most significant sources of energy were gas and coal, which together accounted for over a half of the production of energy, while nuclear and other kinds of energy produced the least amount of energy in france.

Firstly, a amount of gas energy in 2005 had 30,31 percentage, which was a bit higher than 1995 at 29,63 proportion . Moreover, a similar trend was witnessed in the proportion of the coal source, which was rose from 29,80% to 30,93% between 1995 and 2005.

Then, the most significant drop is the production of Petro energy, which decreased dramatically around 10% in 2005, compared to the generation of this energy in 1995. Next, there was an 5% growth from both nuclear and other sources to 10,10% and 9,10% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-22 truongquangwt 73 view
2019-08-27 wardiati 78 view
2019-08-27 wardiati 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... the most significant sources of energy were gas and coal, which together accounted ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... amount of energy in france. Firstly, a amount of gas energy in 2005 had 30,31 ...
^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...bit higher than 1995 at 29,63 proportion . Moreover, a similar trend was witnessed...
^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al source, which was rose from 29,80% to 30,93% between 1995 and 2005. Then, th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87421383648 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60821269023 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4586933372 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103866686962 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576076998287 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584841002508 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791951731155 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578702269975 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.