Student should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exam, and skills such as cooking and dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Advocate for conservative thoughts may argue that students should receive academic knowledge to pass exam and it is pointless to provide them with realistic skills such as cooking and dressing. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this statement as what at issue nowadays are not only theories but also practical abilities.
On the one hand, the mindset of teaching for examination only is completely inappropriate and leads to detrimental impact on the students themselves. Doing this will eventually result in the low rate of enthusiastic among learners. Owning to the lack of practical application and constant pressure from teachers and parents, students may not be able to fully aware the importance of learning specialized knowledge and commence to get frustrated with these subjects. For instance, many pupils in VietNam consider arithmetic as a torture instead of a useful tool as a result of learning for examination process.
On the other hand, household work and personal styling are indispensable parts of individuals’ lives and mastering them at early stage will be immensely helpful for the long run. Firstly, knowing how do household works can make one become more self-reliant and therefore he can easily cope with the environment change as well as other problems in life. Moreover, in particular, with high cooking skills, one is likely to acquire higher chance for social communication. For instance, it is comprehensible to see individual who cook well have more friends thanks to making parties at homes monthly. Secondly, dressing beautifully plays a paramount role in boosting self-esteem. The more stunning you are, the more confident you have. When you are comfortable with yourself, you are likely to be braver to do what you want. For example, it has become far more normal to see female students who afraid to take presentations in class as a result of inferiority complex with their appearance. In this way, if schools can teach knowledge about styling, the aforementioned problems can be mitigated.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with method in which knowledge is given for testing only and it it nonsense to teach realistic skills such as cooking and dressing
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-24 | ntv | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 95 | view |
- Student should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exam and skills such as cooking and dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Governments investment on arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of poliicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others, agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The cost of living is higher in many countries. What are the effects of higher prices to individuals and society? What is the best way for people to deal with this problem? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 97, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...knowledge is given for testing only and it it nonsense to teach realistic skills such...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kills such as cooking and dressing
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30878186969 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03284748323 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580736543909 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7359604587 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.375 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238317221025 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730800607528 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684985313331 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147719546584 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524769753036 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.