Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Given that watching TV is an effective channel for children to acquire knowledge, children as the audiences and learners should be encouraged to watch TV no matter they are at home or at school. While I disagree with such statement.
On one hand, I suppose that the knowledge children can acquire in classes is limited, but they could expand the scope of knowledge through watching different contents of programs. For example, a documentary about rare animals, not only can help children have a great understanding of the animals, but also can instill the sense of protecting them. Apart from it, watching TV at home is a great choice for children to ease the study pressure.
However, the knowledge children acquire on TV cannot help them make progress and get great grades in study because it is irrelevant to their curriculum and exams. It means if children want to have further education, they must concentrate on the knowledge imparted by teachers. In addition, children lack sufficient time to watch TV at school. They stay at school about six hours per day and their school life are occupied by various courses.
In terms of watching TV at home, it definitely has function to release children’s stress in a given time. But children lack self-discipline as well as parents are busy with work, leading children expand the time of watching TV. What’s worse, they could become immersed in watching TV. Moreover, the time they spend on TV can be utilized to do other meaningful things, such as study、physical exercise. Compared to watching TV, these things are more conducive to children’s development.
In conclusion, it is a strange encouragement, and from what I have discussed, I see no reason behind to encourage them to watch.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Oliviachenlu | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Oliviachenlu | 61 | view |
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 70
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002,withprojectionsto2050. 67
- The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries 55
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o matter they are at home or at school. While I disagree with such statement. On...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, apart from, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09965635739 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98563931361 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.578078077 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485978762349 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174418782956 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115791272187 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283266330411 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115075306545 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.