social media, such as TV, radio and newspaper provide people with wrong information and mislead socities?
In the last three decades, the world has been exposed to many problems. Some people believe that social media, such a TV news, newspaper and radio could contribute to finding solutions for a better society; however, others claim that modern media provides wrong information and misleads people, From a personal perspective, the latter point of view carries more weight given that current media press wants to control audience thoughts and earn more profits.
The first and foremost point, recently, social media has become very strong and could influence people’s opinions. To put it in other words, media press could not only mislead the public, but also limit their ability to think and analyze. A vivid example of that, the last presidential election in Egypt in 2013, Al Jazeera news channel allegedly biased coverage of news that related to Egypt and its government, it wanted to convince the world that Egypt did not have a democratic environment, in order to destroy Egypt’s image in the region. Provide that media press spread fake news, it could captivate people’s thoughts and restrict their ability to form an unbiased opinion about an incident.
Next, coupled with hegemony audience thoughts, making money is another reason why social media could mislead the public. Likewise, current media today shows people news that has a spice to attract them without taking the social problems into consideration. For instance, today social media all over the world could spread rumors about celebrities in order to grab public attention. Furthermore, many Egyptian channels consume the entire airtime to cove celebrities’ wedding; on the other hand, it does not represent the problems that face the Egyptian society. Although people want some entertainment through the media press, the balance should be maintained between both sides.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, social media today misleads the public not only to dominate, but also to make money. It is suggested that media represents people voice and opinion rather than being selfish, greedy and power hunger.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to learn about life is by listening to the advice of others. Give specific examples to support your opinion. 77
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 37
- the pterosaurs capable of powered flight 73
- tpo 40 70
- you have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being selfish, greedy and power hunger.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, likewise, so, for instance, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39156626506 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63323306763 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599397590361 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2317175921 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.692307692 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308513747074 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990932410328 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884948898652 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189186826021 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820831194764 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.