Tpo 25 Q1
The passage explains excavated vessel produced of clay and a copper cylinder surronding an iron rod. At the begininig of studying the clay,the archeologist suggests ancient electric battery for these objects; however, there was many arguments to disagree with this function.
To indicate the disagreements, reading claims three reasons which the lecturer casts doubt on them.
First and foremost, the reading states that there are no conductors or wires in excavated location of these objects and the electricity produced with this ancient battery neeeds to be conducted by attached metal wires which there was not any trace around the excavated location of vessels; whereas, the lecturer explained that local people would had used other materials as a conducter which is may be overlooked or throughed out by archeologist in excavated fields or nearby areas.
Moreover, the texts states that the jarslook like copper cylinders in the Seleucia's ruins were used not only for generating electricity but also holding scrolls of sacred texts which were found during more excavation accomplishments; however, the professor argues this reason by recent analysis of the vessels' inner walls. The remained of some liquids on the inner walls shows probable electricity producers liquids in the vessels.
Finally, the reading posits, in ancient time, no device was rely on electricity and batteries, and the electricity producing vessels was useless completely. In the contrast, the lecturer illustrates some possible usage of the vessels' mild electricity power in sensation and shock inducement as invisible power for magical affairs and medical purpose such as releifing pain and healing muscles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...d. At the begininig of studying the clay,the archeologist suggests ancient electric ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es this reason by recent analysis of the vessels inner walls. The remained of som...
^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
... posits, in ancient time, no device was rely on electricity and batteries, and the e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55984555985 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79046157649 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 125.766586878 49.2860985944 255% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.0 110.228320801 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.375 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386852125775 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152275146069 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944470737943 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180422839432 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981764302055 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.3589403974 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 53.8541721854 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.0289183223 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.