The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
The bar chart bellow indicates clear information about the percentage of commuters who used four different means for travelling between home and work place in a European city from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the citizens tend to use the car over a period and it had a significant growth, when other types of transport experienced a sharp decrease during a period of four decades.
In 1960, nearly 35% of people commuted to work on foot, compared with only 5% of citizens traveled by the car. Moreover, the percentage of those used bike and bus were 25 and 18%, respectively. In 1980, approximately 26% of people used the bus, whereas the figure was about 17% for the foot. However, for the car and bike it accounted for nearly 22% and 20% respectively.
At the end of the period (2010), over 35% of passengers find the car as the most popular vehicle. In contrast, only 6% and 9% of commuters used bike and walked on foot, respectively. Finally, travelling by bus accounted for almost 16% of people among the total citizens.
- Describe provided map which illustrating what changes have happened in Foton and Meadowside. 67
- The following charts represent the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.Summarize the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Most of the people make mistake by associating money with happiness .What are the various reasons and solutions for it. 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71038251366 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70994179389 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3139751666 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21894584706 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815318876113 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10715934648 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142150827065 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13321164754 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.