Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
In recent decades, selecting students in education system still gain in public attention for many reasons. Although other perspectives tend to encourage school grouping students as well as the same-ability, plenty of evidence suggests that the opposite is true.
There are a number of reasons why different academic ability brings a myriad of good views. First, by mixing ability classes, children can have the best opportunity to enhance their ability interacting and communicating skills with the peers. For example, a literature student can communicate with mathematics student and sharing his or her knowledge, which taking them into advance levels in a variety of subjects. Second, Competitive and challenge play a vital role for many students, on this occasion, the incentive for weaker students is trying to study hard as their classmates. In fact, either linguistics student or Mathematics students, they could improve themselves as many subjects as he or she likes.
On the other hand, grouping students the same ability also brings the net beneficial as well. Initially, making easier for teachers preparing materials or tools to teaching. For instance, teachers can provide students the same materials and methods, which not squander teachers’ times. In addition, with this system, students tend to study with confidence and self-esteem since no one is made to feel inferior by his or her peers. This can mention that, the emotion of outstanding students feel less reliant on weaker students when they student as the same manner.
In conclusion, by grouping students as the same-ability will do more harm than good. Mixed-ability should be promoted, by leading the academic into high degree.
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s world? 84
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 to 2000 83
- Topic: In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of Subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s 61
- Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 86
- Many people believe that schools should teach Children to become good citizens and workers rather than independent individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or her peers. This can mention that, the emotion of outstanding students feel les...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46441947566 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88432799903 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2531441277 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.214285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251443550642 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881035863373 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338366105494 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152422635576 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243433818835 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.