a table shows monthly expenditure of an Australian family in 1991 and in 2001
The table gives an overall view about total spending every month of a family in Australia between 1991 and 2001.
As can be seen from the table, the total expenditure increased slightly from 675 dollars to 715 dollars. Of all areas, in particular, food was always at the top spending, increasing from 155 dollars to 160 dollars in 10 years. Electricity and water, although starting from only a half of food, but experienced a greater rise, almost doubling its figure in 2001 with 120 dollars. Housing came third, with a mere 5 dollars increase over the same period, reaching 100 dollars at the end.
A reversed pattern can be seen in transport and clothing which stood at the last positions. While transport’s expenditure was declined by a half, dropping to only 45 dollars, clothing had a lower decrease of 10 dollar, but came last with a mere 20 dollars. Other goods and services, meanwhile, made up the remaining from 250 dollars to 270 dollars in the given period.
To recap, it is noticeable that this Australian spent the highest amount of money on food every month. However, it was electricity and water that increased at the largest level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-27 | maiphuong0610 | 57 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Le Thi Anh Suong 95 | 84 | view |
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobiles phones in communication has negative effects on young people’s reading and writing skills. Agree or disagree 84
- two charts 89
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...rs, clothing had a lower decrease of 10 dollar, but came last with a mere 20 dollars. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, third, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91414141414 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68808357132 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641414141414 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2868788562 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14129000107 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588833005124 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10481233869 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124159155801 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136047737512 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.