We often hear that new technology presents a threat to our traditions. In what ways, however, can new technology help maintain our traditions.
It frequently comes to notice that due to technology, many traditions are in danger. But technology is also proved enormously beneficial in terms of keeping our traditions alive. This essay intends to discuss two main techniques, Storing books, pictures and by video recording, of technology to keep our cultures live.
Old books and images, which are considered as the pillar of any tradition, can be stored in the computer. In order to store big sized books, huge physical space is required. Thanks to technology, which made it possible to store these books in very small sized hard disk. Paintings of ancient times are more prone to be torn, these paintings can be scanned and preserved. These stored files will be available for life time and can be used to demonstrate culture to forthcoming generation. Thus worry of keeping books in a spacious place is diminished.
For spreading awareness about a particular culture, videography proved very fruitful. Extinction of cultures and traditions is a matter of great concern in which variety of cultures are considered to lose their existence. Video recordings can be made for the sake of maintaining culture for forever. Making these videos available on Youtube, a popular application for watching videos, for everyone, can serve the purpose of enlightening people about culture and tradition. By this, individuals can also get acquainted with all the cultures, and people from same culture, who are residing overseas, can learn about their own cultural values and tradition.
In conclusion, it could be reiterated that with the help of technology, traditions can be preserved in the form of images, pdf files and video graphy and people from far flung areas can access this material.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-01 | Angrej Singh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Angrej Singh | 73 | view |
- Write a recommendation letter for your friend who is applying for a job. In your letter say:How long do you know him/her?What are the main qualities of your friend?What is his/her work experience? 78
- You have recently used the services of a moving company At the new place you found out that some of your items were badly damaged Write a letter to the company manager including the following Give details of your move List items were damaged Say what you 69
- Some people believe the elderly said that life was better in the past Do you agree or disagree 95
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- You are unable to attend to your friend's wedding in Britain. In this letterTell her what you think about her wedding planApologize for not attendingSuggest date for future meeting. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and by video recording, of technology to keep our cultures live. Old books a...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...hese stored files will be available for life time and can be used to demonstrate culture ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20996441281 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83417049319 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1992101032 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092248007224 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033196344576 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407088176648 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651471503977 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417160449989 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.