Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Professors should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class.
The creation of electronic devices such as tablets and smartphones has had an enormous impact on people's lives. Whether they can be used in college classes has stirred some controversy among educators and students. Some say that electronic gadgets enrich class experience, which others believe otherwise. As far as I’m concerned, devices with internet connection should be banned in college class, which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To start with, devices with internet access can become a big distraction for students. Needless to say, internet is loaded with all of information, like breaking news about North Korea, gossips about some celebrity, the release of a new album by some pop singer. By just a tap on the screen, students can gain access to all of these news and thus get distracted by it. Students are supposed to be concentrated on what the professor is talking about, acquiring the knowledge the professor is trying to explain. With electronic devices providing all types of unrelated information, it is difficult for students to pay any attention to the professor. On the other hand, some people may claim that college students are adults and therefore have the self-discipline needed to resist the temptation. They ignore the fact that most college students are still developing their character at college. So the majority of college students are still in need of outside force to help them learn about rules and discipline. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that electronic devices that can link to the internet should be prohibited in class.
On top of that, the absence of internet-connecting devices in class makes a more enjoyable and effective learning environment. Many students use messaging applications like whatsup on their tablets or smartphones to talk to their friends in class. But incoming message often comes with a notification ring. Not all students remember to switch their gadgets to silent mode. So when a new message comes in, the ring may surprise every student and the professor and disturb the course of a lecture. Moreover, it is not uncommon to see a video like this on youtube. Some student opened his laptop in a class and the sound of some moaning from some porn shocked everyone. By removing such devices, everyone, including professors, can have a comfortable learning environment and improve their academic performance in an effective way. Considering the likely disturbance which devices with internet access may bring, it is better to ban devices that can get online in class.
In conclusion, electronic devices which can get access to internet should be banned in college class because it may distract students from studying and the lack of it brings a better learning atmosphere.
- Playing sports teaches people important lessons about life. 75
- Which do you prefer Travel to foreign countries when you are young or when you are older Give specific reasons or examples to support your decision 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Professors should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...een, students can gain access to all of these news and thus get distracted by it. Students...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 809, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and improve their academic performance in an effective way. Considering the likely disturbance wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, talking about, to start with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19642857143 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88197132693 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513392857143 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6196181148 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.217391304 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04347826087 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276636393409 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861270510526 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853617999834 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186946818846 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215058966634 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.