"Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
he recommendation mentioned above states that the manned space flight is dangerous and costly; therefore the investment should be done in unmanned space flight, pointing out the successes of recent unmanned space probes and satellites, but the evidence provided are not enough to please the authority, for lack of appropriate data and facts. The above argument is based on myriad of fallacies, which renders the conclusion baseless.
First and foremost, the author has mentioned about the successes of unmanned space probes and satellites, but he failed to provide enough data so that the fact can easily be accepted. It would be great if he had attested some data regarding the success rate of unmanned and manned space flight and the like. Furthermore, data regarding the total number of deaths of the astronauts would have bolster his case and convince the editor.
Secondly, he has overlooked the evidence of the decreasing rate of space accidents, with increasing success rates of the manned space flights. It might be true that the unmanned space probes and satellites are having great success rates, but it can also be true that the manned space flights have had even greater success rates and gathered greater information than the unmanned one. This may seemingly indicate that, the author is a timid astronaut who fears a lot about going to space for a flight, and support unmanned space flight rather than to have some adventure.
Likewise, the argument is based on only few things, like cost and risk. It has overlooked several other factors which would prop-up the case even strongly like lower success rate of manned space flight, advances in the technology, and so on. The argument also seems incomplete in the sense that, the author could have hidden the several unsuccess rates of the unmanned space probes, focusing only on the cost and risk. The case would have even more supported if he had provided the evidence of adoption of unmanned space flights on other reaserch stations of other countries, and the achievements that had procured.
In sum, it can be stated that the argument is based on myriad of fallacies, which lack convincing power to the one reading the particular piece of paper. If provided with data and facts, encompassed with successful instances of unmanned space flights, the argument would otherwise seemed plausible, and more convincing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn asmuch by watching television as they can by reading books 54
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 58
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 391 350
No. of Characters: 1944 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.447 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.972 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.493 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.067 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.411 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.64 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.147 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he recommendation mentioned above states t...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bolstered'.
Suggestion: bolstered
... of deaths of the astronauts would have bolster his case and convince the editor. Se...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, likewise, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 391.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10230179028 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58363672636 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43989769821 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.67365269461 418% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6864128655 57.8364921388 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 119.503703932 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9285714286 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351724422585 0.218282227539 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132538829118 0.0743258471296 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876622942881 0.0701772020484 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209428939216 0.128457276422 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652746415591 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.