Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Over the ending of the 20th century and the beginning of 21st century the population has been enhancing at a geometric rate that it has already resulted in shrinking habitats for the majority of endangered species and extinction of several species due to deforestation for agriculture and building dwelling areas, growing carbon dioxide emissions from firing fossil fuel etc. While one might say It is a high time for governments over the word to rise this urgent problem and preserve the pristine environment, the rest arguers point up there must be pitfalls.
Indeed, it should come no surprise that over the recorded history of human race the government power has been always one of the most prominent and tremendous one in its ability to make the others act in required, needed way. Nowadays are not the exception from this rule. Were not it for the governance influence through laws and pacts, there were the bedlam in the huge part of the world. Consider a lucid instance of the Paris Union created for struggling with changes on the Earth in frame of which the set of problems are being solved – the great idea in a sophisticated, exquisite package. However, despite the obvious beneficent aim – supporting green credentials and substantial development, outrageously the USA has left it based the belief of the new head of their government - there is no evidence of climate changes.
So, it can be pointed out that the process of rescuing what is left from our home is not just a question of creating appropriate principles on paper. As one of the eco-activist slogans says: “The Earth has changed and so have we”. According to the path-breaking research papers and questionnaires among the population of developed and a part of developing countries, rising awareness among generation, including corporations, heads of governments and people, would be able to solve the ecological problem and save the pristine environment for our descendants. To illustrate this point, consider the instance with Greta Tumberg, the 16-years old girl from the European union, who rose the question of precarious, hazard lifestyle of the humankind and as well the reluctant actions of the developed countries to solve this issue. It should come no surprise that her performance during the last meeting of the world leaders that took the place in the USA approximately one month ago has made a considerable dissonance among the society.
Presumably, the awareness from corporations’ – quasi- governance and private – side might be averred to be the most powerful – since they are liable for creating of the major part of waste through production goods and producing plastic, non- disposable items at an unprecedented scale. In case of modification of it, the tremendous part of garbage will have left in past. Furthermore, people in developed and in a part of developing countries are able to alter recognition of lifestyle – get rid of plastic bags, cut down on amount of using plastic packaging etc. The current position in emerging countries, where economic situation is oscillating constantly, projections are volatile, the population has been growing on a significant pace in joint with slums in these nations. The controlling of consumption and pollution in such regions are conceived to be arduous and almost impossible. Here in contrast to the abovementioned countries, the governance regulation is demanded at by far higher level.
In conclusion, it can be estimated that the laws and pacts for supporting and preserving the wilderness aeries must be passed. As well having analyzed all facts, examples and occurrences above, it could be highlighted that the additional steps should be taken for rising the whole awareness of emerging problems among countries, companies, people. While formal actions are advantageous and fruitful, so is command work since were not it for, it would be like to get blood from a stone.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 60
- The influence of adds on children 73
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 83
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 80
- Love and Money 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...emendous part of garbage will have left in past. Furthermore, people in developed and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 99.0 58.6224719101 169% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3311.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 641.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16536661466 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0316973083 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99440801538 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 342.0 215.323595506 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533541341654 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 1026.0 704.065955056 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.6309172206 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.666666667 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5238095238 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153326355469 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437429151317 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405989961454 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915699737461 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400993045215 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 182.0 100.480337079 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.