The graph below shows the average of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The poly line graph illustrates the information about the level of CO2 which spread by per people in four various regions such as the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal which was in three decades from 1967 to 2007. Units were measured in metric tonnes.
In overall, the United Kingdom constituted a major for realising carbon dioxide since Portugal left least amount. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the average of carbon dioxide emissions per person in several nations over the periods.
With regards to the graph, the United Kingdom was most popular for omitting CO2 by per people in the all given years which accounted at over a one in ten metric tonnes during 1967. After one decade, it start declined steadily and observed at below 10 metric tonnes in the last year. Likewise, an amount of Italy for spreading carbon dioxide per person shown ups and down trend between 1967 and 2007 and experienced at over 4 metric tonnes to nearly 8 metric tonnes in given time periods.
The graph further proves that Portugal attained a lowest figure of emissions of CO2. In addition to this, it started from approximately 2 metric tonnes during 1967. Furthermore, in the next remained years, it increased dramatically at over 5 metric tonnes. Lastly, from 1967 to 2007, average of carbon dioxide omissions per person was found above 4 metric tonnes, 6 metric tonnes, around 8 metric tonnes and 10 metric tonnes respectively in Sweden.
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way of life? 67
- The chart shows the components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that one of the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Today, more and more computers and laptops are using in hospitals, schools, offices and banks. Some people think that these tools improve the conditions of those sectors. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the average of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...967. After one decade, it start declined steadily and observed at below 10 metric...
^^
Line 13, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...h further proves that Portugal attained a lowest figure of emissions of CO2. In a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, lastly, likewise, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98785425101 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50442084822 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554655870445 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5285771602 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262942675032 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104617603848 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658114702075 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181486327373 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378533517341 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.