Some people believe public transport should be free of charge. Do you think the advantages are more than disadvantages?
It is argued that public transport ought to be free of cost. I believe benefits to the poor section of society and environment have an edge over the drawback of burden on the government to cope with the finances involved.
Providing costless transportation to the public will be huge burden on the government. If public transport is set without any charges, people tend to use more public transport as it is human tendency to use the facilities for free. Thus, government has to strengthen (effectuate) the transport system by deploying more vehicles and it would involve a considerable chunk of funds to maintain transport and bear daily operational costs, such as wages of workers, fuel expenses and repair work, which transport entails. It would possibly have negative consequences on the other public facilities such as medical facilities, education.
Granted, I believe making available free public transport would definitely be fruitful for the environment. It has been seen that people more often than not use private vehicles for their day-to-day affairs which pose a great threat to the environment by emitting toxic gases. By making transport system without any cost will encourage locals to commute in it. Hence, environmental degradation can be reined to the great extent. Singapore is good paradigm of this where public transport made free for a month and its outcome was beyond belief in the context of securing atmosphere.
Furthermore, underprivileged sections of the society will be benefitted the most of the facility of costless public transport. Under poverty people, who are finding it difficult to survive, will be relieved and can possibly spare their money, dispensed on traveling, for utilizing in the other crucial areas. This step could set a good precedent for spending the public money directly to them in order to ease their lives.
In conclusion, despite the disadvantage of stress on government to bear exorbitant expenses of making public transport free of charge, I think benefits to the general public and nature outnumber.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | Angrej Singh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Angrej Singh | 63 | view |
- Living a comfortable life in urban areas seems unrealistic nowadays. This essay intends to discuss two main problems, pollution and impure food, confronted by individuals of metropolitan cities and with governmental as well as people's efforts this s 84
- Write a recommendation letter for your friend who is applying for a job. In your letter say:How long do you know him/her?What are the main qualities of your friend?What is his/her work experience? 78
- In some countries air travel has become a much cheaper form of transport than in the past Some people say this is a positive development but other people disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...ficult to survive, will be relieved and can possibly spare their money, dispensed on traveli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to them in order to ease their lives. In conclusion, despite the disadvantage ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...free of charge, I think benefits to the general public and nature outnumber.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, then, thus, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89244130668 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.702623118 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.866666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312863074472 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11171795221 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788616319935 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179565963025 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055324955204 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.