Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Economic development is obviously one of the top priorities of any government across the globe. While some individuals believe this growth has a seriously harmful impact on the environment, I would argue that this development is the only solution to stop poorness and starvation.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why it is claimed that the environment is negatively affected by the economic growth. Firstly, when a country focuses on growing its economy, there are definitely more factories and plants are built in that country. This would lead to high levels of exhaust fumes and CO2 emission being emitted into the air and make air pollution become serious. Secondly, manufactories also create a huge amount of waste and garbage, which has a devastating effect on the rivers and oceans. For instance, the waste water emission of a foreign company located in Dong Nai province of Viet Nam in recent years has resulted in the mass death of fish in Dong Nai river.
On the other hand, I believe that developing the economy effectively helps to cease the impoverish situation. The first reason is that a wealthy economy creates more job opportunities that allow each citizen to easily seek for stable careers and have a decent income. For example, the unemployment rate in America, which is usually ranked as the leading economy of the world, is always lowest thanks to its sustainable economic enhancement. Moreover, if many businesses and enterprises are successful, they will in turn greatly contribute to the nation’s budget through the tax system. This fund will consequently be allocated on building houses for the miserable elderly, homeless people or doing charity.
In conclusion, despite the fact that the rapid development of economy may have an adverse influence on the Earth, I believe this growth effectively helps to increase the nation’s growth and minimize the problem of impoverishment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | LucyLiu | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | phanduydat | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Chang Xu | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | cathylearnsrock | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | michidmaa | 89 | view |
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods such as television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- Organize tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. It is a positive or negative development for the local and the environment? 89
- Sport is becoming a business with high income for professionals and more companies have involved in financial and in other ways Is it a positive or negative development 95
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 85, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the economy effectively helps to cease the impoverish situation. The first reason is that a w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 380, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'always the lowest'.
Suggestion: always the lowest
...as the leading economy of the world, is always lowest thanks to its sustainable economic enha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24437299035 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9076201647 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610932475884 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6632839554 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119427665111 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040071220635 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485437543036 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075323864353 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300870707217 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.