The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the changes in forest land in millions of hectares in 6 areas of the world from 1990 to 2005.
According to the table, there was an upward trend of forest Asia and Europe in this 15 years period. In particular, Asia made up a most change with 8 ha increase compared with 1990. While Europe only rose from 989 ha to 1001 ha over the 15 years period.
As can be seen from the table, there was a downward tendency of forest area in Africa, North America, Oceania and South America. In this category, South America accounted for the most significant change by 69 ha in 2005 compared with 1990. Meanwhile, the most insignificant shift was North America, only 2 ha changes from 708 ha in 1990 to 705 ha in both year 2000 and 2005.
In general, during this 15 years period, Europe took the largest forest area of the whole with 989 ha, 998 ha, and 1001 ha respectively, while Oceania accounted for the least proportion at only 199 ha, 198 ha, and 197 ha.
In conclusion, the research shows a decrease of forest lands in general from 1990 to 2005
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
- alterations and differences in average house prices in five major cities over the period from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 67
- In some cities, there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and otherbuildings, and owners can decide on the styles of their houses. Do the advantages of thisoutweigh its drawbacks? 73
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... with 8 ha increase compared with 1990. While Europe only rose from 989 ha to 1001 ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in conclusion, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45408163265 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4167253101 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.944701986 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0704617505936 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503101332668 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805868112156 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839108209415 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943685185564 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.