Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, people from different culture travel abroad to work, study or live there and they take with them their own language, customs and traditions. Language is the only source of communication between population and it differs from one country to another. When you live in a state that speaks different language than yours, can produce social as well as practical problems and it may also face no difficulties.
First, living in a country where you speak a foreign language than the local one can cause some obstacles. If your languages are limited, in other words if your foreign language is not that accurate you may face a lot of social problems like not understanding on one another. Practical difficulties can be seen too, for example if your car is towed and you need help how can you express yourself or the situation if you cannot speak the local language?
On the other hand, talking different language than the regional one isn’t a big deal. In Australia for example, if your English is so basic they don’t make fun of you or even if you speak a word in English and the other in your language in wont cause you any social trouble in contrast they are too friendly and they can communicate with you in the same level of your learnings. Also practical problems are easy to deal with since you can fix any difficulty by google translate or even by the help of a common friend.
In conclusion, if you live abroad and you speak a foreign language is not a problem since you can learn the local one by frequently practicing it and also you can manage any social and practical issues. In these recent days, technology solves each and every problem with just one button.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | sepide1367 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | olParya | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Nimaianp75 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Varpuleva | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings but many of them lead unhappy lives Do you agree To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ou in the same level of your learnings. Also practical problems are easy to deal wit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70805369128 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5554280665 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1299484697 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.545454545 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352582479838 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155118996124 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106779169513 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247982459326 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562328760333 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.