TPO 52
In this set of materials, both the lecturer and the reading passage discuss process of sending people to astroids and colonize them. The reading passage provides three reasons to support the colonization of asteroids. However, the professor remarks that it is not practical for human to live of asteroids, and casts doubts on the every reasons which have been presented by the text.
Firstly, the atricle contends that lower gravity of asteroids, which is the result of their low mass, makes the landing on the them so safe, and the spacecrafts can carry more weights. On the other hand, the professor articulates, the low gravity of asteroids brings about a variety of risks and health problem such as losing the muscle mass and lowering of the bones density.
In addition, the essay alleges that there are significant mines of rare metals such as gold and platinum on these astroids which the colonists can pay their costs via sending them back to the earth. Nevertheless, the lecturer avers it is not the whole picture. The costs of mining these raw materials and transfering them to the earh is enormous. Besides, the price of these materials would not remain constant, because the more supply cause the more fall in their price.
Eventually, the article asserts that some asteroid come close to earth, thus it is remarkably easy and cheap to go to these astroids than some planer such as Mars. On the contrary, the professor declares it is true that these asteroids are easy to reach; however, their orbits only in a cramp span of time close to earth; however when the human would like to come their distance to earth has increased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | AT2G38040 | 85 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | parsaramezan | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | lutzuming | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 81 | view |
- TPO 54: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 23 60
- TPO 22 3
- TPO 52 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...of their low mass, makes the landing on the them so safe, and the spacecrafts can carry ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bones'' or 'bone's'?
Suggestion: bones'; bone's
...ing the muscle mass and lowering of the bones density. In addition, the essay al...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, such as, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88256227758 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46089976619 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8209199728 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.727272727 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.