Some People believe that to protect local culture , Tourism should be banned in some areas Whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both side and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some People believe that to protect local culture , Tourism should be banned in some areas Whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both side and give your opinion.

Tradition plays significant role representing ethnic values of any area and it should be protected in every possible way. While some people support that excursion within some region should be stopped in order to save regional values, others hold a vies that it is inexorable to protect by forbidding such sights. In my opinion, I believe that affects to cultures are unavoidable and prohibiting travelers will not have significant advantages.

On one side of the argument, there are some reasons, why people consider the notion that tourist should not be allowed in some part to save local culture. Firstly, tourist carries their own traditional values and lifestyle along with them. Local people in some area who represents core values of that region may get exposed to different cultures and it could have inimical effects to region by getting influenced from those travelers. Furthermore, travelers are unaware of important rituals associated with some places, they might harm the moral values. For instance, wearing scarf for covering hairs is essential in Gurudwara, but tourist may break the ritual unknowingly, it can harm sentiments attached to community. As a result, they believe that ban is necessary to save customs associated with pilgrims to protect local values.

Despite the above argument, I am of the view that excursion is not solution to saving the local cultures. Indeed, one reason I take this position is that tourism is not the only way which introduces local person to different cultures. There are many other ways such as internet, advertisement effects the local cultures. Therefore, banning tourism will not help to save conventional methods. In addition, banning tourism can have detrimental effects on economical system of the region. Tourism brings financial solution for some areas. For example, some places in india such as jaisalmer, where people earns by selling homemade artifacts and providing guidance to local places. Preventing travelers will bring economical downfall for that region. Therefore, I believe that banning tourist will bring negative impact.

In conclusion, though both views are commonly held in society, I support that tradition van be saved in different other ways because banning tourism can have detrimental effects on economical system. Moreover, There are other ways regional art gets harmed. Given this situation, it is recommended that people should get in-depth knowledge of their culture and they should understand importance of it. It will help to stay attached with moral values of the region.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-06 vikrampreet SINGH 78 view
2020-03-15 Emjay 67 view
2019-12-06 shaily 67 view
2019-06-04 Tolik 84 view
2018-10-02 nazirsumara 84 view
Essays by user shaily :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 454, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...tourism can have detrimental effects on economical system of the region. Tourism brings fi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 182, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...tourism can have detrimental effects on economical system. Moreover, There are other ways ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39205955335 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71626146351 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8514536282 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7727272727 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345891379356 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982796098342 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613963807931 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217183124493 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293581327557 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.