Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Academic education is undeniably a crucial part of human life as our future absolutely depends on it. A controversial argument that is often raised regarding this topic is whether we have to be a specialist on only one subject or widen our knowledge or many subjects. If I were obliged to take one side, I would think that becoming a specialist in one specific subject is much better for several reasons, on a few of which I will elaborate subsequently.
The first reason corroborating my view is that nowadays, all works need a specialist and there is no need to know everything. Besides, science becomes so broad that is takes a lot of effort to master the subject we are studying. Thus, we do not have enough time to spend it on other subjects. My father's experience is a compelling example of this. When he married, in addition to his work as a civil engineer he had to know how to fix the oven if it is broken or he had to know how to work with the electricity system or he had to fertilize the plants in his garden and cut them if it needed. At that time, it was unusual if a man called for somebody else to come to his home and fix such items that I mentioned. as an example, they had to study how to deal with electricity system in their high school and it did not matter if their major was not related to it. Furthermore, since their knowledge was not enough and they studied a little about it, they could not fix it. My father told me that one of his friends accidentally burned the house as he cut the wrong wire. But now, we only focus on the subjects that are related to our major.
The second rationale why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that it would raise the job opportunity and the one who does that job will be more professional in it. Let us imagine if people today had to know everything that my father knew as I explained above. Then, we will not have electricity man or gardener. But as the world inclined to have more specialists in every subject we have more wide job opportunity. Besides, they are more professional. For example, a gardener who devoted all of his life in this work knows everything about the specific toxic or fertilizer he had to use on any plants so it would flourish better.
To make a long story short, It is definitely suitable to specialize in one subject as not only will it raise the job opportunity but also today's world does not need people who know about everything in a shallow depth.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In high schools and colleges, it is more desirable for a group project to be evaluated the same regardless of the individual students’ performances. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays more and more people spend too much money on their pets dogs cats and others although there are better uses for this money 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...me and fix such items that I mentioned. as an example, they had to study how to de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, then, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35217391304 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59937737928 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476086956522 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8312412543 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172646135588 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503983000571 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044627059407 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113043812796 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483147257539 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.