Measures to control spread of cane toad in Australia
Reading and Writing are about different measures to control spread of cane toad in Australia. More specifically, in regard to passages, the author is of the opinion that these measures will play a vital role in controlling their population, and supports his position by providing three arguments. The speaker is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the argument made in reading text as these measures will be ineffective in controlling the spread of cane toads, and address, in detail trouble with each of them.
First of all, author mentions that building a national fence will prevent spreading of cane toads to other which they have still not explored. Further, he adds that same technique was used to control spread of rabbits as they were having negative effects on Australian ecosystem. Nevertheless, the speaker contends this argument by revealing that building a national fence will not be able to stop young toads and eggs to reach different places and they are normally found in rivers and streams. Next, he explains that every land is surrounded by water bodies and a few of their young toads and eggs are enough to further colonize that area.
Secondly, the author claims that we can have volunteers capture and kill the population of cane toads. Furthermore, he notes that it’s easy to capture them by hand and maximum of their young ones and eggs are just restricted to water, so collective efforts can turn the tables. Yet, the speaker contradicts this claim by pointing out that volunteers used will be inexperienced and they can catch and kill other species of frogs which are natural habitat of Australia. He elaborates it further by stating that young ones of Australian native frog looks just same as cane toad young ones.
Finally, the author wraps up his argument by positing that researchers are working on a virus which can help to control their population as it will prevent these frogs from maturing and reproducing. Not surprisingly, in contrast to author’s point, the speaker suggest that as this virus can affect other reptiles and amphibians too, it can lead to destruction of eco-systems of other continents too. Additionally, he refutes that Australian reptiles are many times transported to other continents and if this virus reaches there with these reptiles and it can affect the cane toad in those central and southern America where they are the native species and can eliminate them. As a result, the whole eco-system will suffer.
To sum up, the author and the speaker have conflicting views regarding measure to control spread of cane toads. It is clear that they will have trouble finding a common ground on this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-18 | panizzf | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | jason_linnil | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | JohnSmith96 | 81 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | JohnSmith96 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
- Driverless cars 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements makes product seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment—doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements makes product seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Driverless cars 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in contrast to, in regard to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 7.30242825607 274% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 22.412803532 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 30.3222958057 198% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1373.03311258 164% => OK
No of words: 449.0 270.72406181 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02004454343 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64638211094 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 145.348785872 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47438752784 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 419.366225166 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.356839686 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.588235294 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4117647059 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304863079477 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117418220022 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156609676067 0.0662205650399 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195822635928 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130185087513 0.0443174109184 294% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.