People like to slide down and climb the mountain. What do you think about how they endangered their life? Is it a good trend?
Nowadays many people do extreme activities and most of them do it in mountains. I think it is a good idea to slide down and climb the mountain.
First of all, it is believed that this kind of extreme activities are very interesting and breathtaking. They do it due to desire to try new activity. In this time people experiencing existing emotions. Secondly it is very good experience for their further life. They can tell many differ stories connected with that to their friends and children. The more they put them at risk, the more they live life. They will learn to appreciate every minute of their existence, because there is only one life.
On another hand, it is dangerous for their life. People, who slide down the mountain may get many injuries and even to become disabled person. Moreover, if something goes wrong, for instance, a rope breaks, they may die. Besides, it can be very expensive for some people, they don't have opportunity and sometimes they feel dissapointment.
In conclusion, I would say that it is a good trend, because it can be very funny and interesting, when people do it with their friends. After that, the have a lot of experience and new emotions, memories. However, at the same time extreme activities are very dangerous for their health and life, and dear.
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK доfrom 1992 to 2000. 84
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 78
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 78
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 78
- People like to slide down and climb the mountain. What do you think about how they endangered their life? Is it a good trend? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...be very expensive for some people, they dont have opportunity and sometimes they fee...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 5.60731707317 606% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80888888889 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65870663813 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3696884835 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.625 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.0625 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314891695748 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104074062876 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868308970207 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206268881545 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756154323139 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.