do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Nowadays, team-work has credible roles in schools, universities, and companies because by this fact, not only people can learn each other very well but also they can learn how to work together. In my opinion, when students work together in a group, they learn more effectively rather than they work alone.
To begin with, one of the important factors is related to the experience. When students work in a group, they can share their experiences together. Due to this fact, they can learn each other more effectively. In addition, when students are in the same group, most of them are in the same age. Therefore, the transfer of information between them is so easy. In addition, because of this issue, they will be able to find out how to work together when they are in a group. To illustrate my reason, when my friend was in high school, his teacher had my friend to work with his friends on an assignment. Hence, because of this experience, my friend learned how to work with other people. After some years, he hired a company. Therefore, he is a successful people person in his company because he found out how to communicate and work with other people when he was younger.
Furthermore, another important reason is time. When students work together, not only they can finish their projects quickly but also their efficiency will improve. Moreover, when a student works alone on projects, his projects will take more time and he cannot use the information and experience of other students. In fact, when students are in the same group, their mistaken will decrease. For example, when I was in university, my teacher divided the student into small groups to work on our projects. Therefore, by this decision, we could finish our project sooner than the deadline of the project. In addition, our results were with high accuracy.
In conclusion, based on the reasons stated above, it has some advantages for students to work together rather that they are alone because not only they have a good chance to learn each other but also they can finish their project quickly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86235955056 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55404281585 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452247191011 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3448072243 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.55 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381503959002 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130855215359 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100241403623 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269972893107 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633957235084 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.