Some governments believe it is necessary to impose a higher tax on junk food because an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much of this type of food. What do you think about this?
The increasing intake of junk food has reached at an alarming level. With this, some authorities think that levying higher taxes will help to reduce its consumption and lower the health issues which are caused by it. In my opinion, tax hike will be beneficial in curbing the fast food consumption however, governments should also focus on spreading awareness among the citizens.
To embark on, there are numerous reasons why more number of people eat junk food nowadays. Firstly, many people rely on outside restaurants to have their meals instead of cooking it themselves, due to their busy lifestyles. For many of them, fast food is not only a cheaper option but also saves times as it gets cooked quickly. Secondly, with the increasing customer base there are more number of outlets and it is extremely convenient for anyone to hop on to a nearby outlet to have the food. Furthermore, many fast food selling brands make attractive adverts by telling how delicious and tempting their food is. consuming fast food is not restricted to adults but it a wide spread trend among the kids as well.
Since fast food is considered as the food of the rich, higher tax rates will not be of greater help as it will only affect the section who consume it less frequently. Apart from this, government should make people aware about health impacts of eating fast food. it should be mandatory to display nutritional value chart on the fast food products which will give clear picture to the consumers. there should be laws to prevent having children in fast food adverts and they should be carefully scrutinized whether they are giving wrong information to the people or not.
To conclude with, levying heavy taxes will help in reduction of fast food intake up to a smaller extent however, by taking steps to guide people about its negative effects will further help to reduce its consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | aeropiyush | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | rafsunielts2019 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | rafsunielts2019 | 84 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. 67
- The government should pay to the parents of very young children, so that one of them can stay at home and look after their children.What do you think are the pros and cons of this policy? Justify your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 84
- Some governments believe it is necessary to impose a higher tax on junk food because an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much of this type of food What do you think about this 95
- The claim that animals have "rights" has been subject to much of a debate since 1970. Are zoos helping or hurting animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...out health impacts of eating fast food. it should be mandatory to display nutritio...
^^
Line 13, column 395, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ll give clear picture to the consumers. there should be laws to prevent having childr...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wrong information to the people or not. To conclude with, levying heavy taxes wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91614906832 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48657519678 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562111801242 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1368608546 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262760207748 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104863157995 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713669692857 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160560212761 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530673508149 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.