The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare four different nations, namely India, Sweden, Morocco and Vietnam, in terms of the resources of electricity generation from 2003 to 2008.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that Vietnam and Morocco were the countries that did not use any nuclear power for electricity production. Noticeably, fossil fuels were the largest source of electricity supply in Vietnam and India, whereas Sweden led in using nuclear power in the examined period.
In Vietnam, the total energy output coming from fossil fuels was 56%, while the figure for Morocco was only 5%. The rest of the electricity in both nations was produced primarily from hydropower.
Regarding the other remained two countries (India and Sweden), power from fossil fuels contributed to 82% of the entire quantity of energy created, which was the highest figure for fossil fuels use among of the four countries. Meanwhile, Using fossil fuels was the least popular just 4% of the sum of the made electricity in Sweden. However, the amount of manufactured power in Sweden came from nuclear power and Hydropower with 44% and 52% sequentially, by contrast, the figures for India were 4% and 14% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | Pham Thi Nhung | 11 | view |
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 73
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 67
- Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons of this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 79
- Waste disposal in one European country 2005 2008 59
- The given maps show two di erent underground passage frameworks for autos in two Australian refers to 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17525773196 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6707448578 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2172925459 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835389082808 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474986783992 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397280085895 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655030636753 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037259226693 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.