Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can government do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
It is true that everything comes at a price. We are paying through the nose in terms of environmental damage for the conveniences we enjoy today. Admittedly, the world is becoming a throwaway society, where a large amount of garbage is daily increasing. Most of this rubbish comes from the packaging of the things we buy, such as possessed food. This essay intends to analyze the reasons for the alarming increase in waste production and suggest some solutions to improve the situation.
Undeniably, disposable items have to be used under some specific circumstances. For example, to prevent contagion among patients disposable needles and syringes are essentially used in hospital. In addition to this, low-cost disposable plates and spoons are ubiquitously used in many restaurants out of sanitary consideration. The global population has reached a staggering seven billion recently. Solid waste is a by-product of this phenomenon. This number is expected to balloon to nine billion by 2050 if the current trend goes on.
As a result, recycling seems to be the only way to prevent the total accumulation of the planet by the garbage produced over generations. The demand of goods will increase inexorably. Therefore, recycling offers the best hope. Another way to alleviate this burden on the environment is by educating the culprits – the general public via social media and advertisements.
To recapitulate, people are unlikely to give up their conveniences easily so we cannot stop producing rubbish. But the government can take many measures to struggle against this deleterious problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 61 | view |
| 2015-07-26 | Mr.TIM | 75 | view |
- With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (physical education or cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 89
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. 84
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 84
- Some people believe that the responsibility for the protection of the environment is by a transnational organization, rather than by each individual country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the disadvantages and advantages for young people who decide to do this. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ment is by educating the culprits – the general public via social media and advertisements. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34387351779 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08942272926 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656126482213 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7599914725 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5294117647 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8823529412 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15113837748 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038427588857 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433903064774 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916507008084 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595165331351 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.