Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
Criminal rates and the solution to reduce this problem has been controversial for the last few decades, yet criminals tend to become worse after being imprisoned and penalized. This essay will discuss the reasons behind this and the methodology of the catastrophe.
It is clear that people do not like to be changed and forced not to do specific actions. In a psychological facet, many want to freely have a choice, yet punishing them is no different from making them follow one’s opinions. This is not an exception for criminals. For instance, educate prisoners so that they will have responsibility for society provokes anger and displeasure. As a result, they will wait for the time to no longer be imprisoned to execute unfavorable actions. This happens because they want to demonstrate that they cannot be tamed nor a property of the government. A statistical survey announced that 81% of criminals will perform crimes again after serving the first punishment.
A solution for this is a gradual impact of art to help them stay calm and feel respected. As similar to any other individuals, lawbreakers have altruism and can be generated with proper methods. Art, such as painting or listening to music will alter the heart of these individuals. This method has an exquisite way to influence them slowly, make them believe that prison or punishments are somewhat enjoyable. Consequently, offenders would feel like they not despised by society, but rather cherished so they have no motivation to repetitively commit crimes. An important suggestion to add that everyone wants empathy, not sympathy. With a sophisticated impact on criminals, they would certainly change and perfect themselves.
In conclusion, the main reason for lawbreakers to execute wrong behaviors is disrespect and forceful actions. With regard to this, authorities are required to provide them with sufficient care and compassion to stimulate a better version of every individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Khiem Duy | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Khiem Duy | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Tammy Ruby | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | duongviethoang93 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | duongviethoang93 | 78 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities can be solved by moving large companies, factories, and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 74
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news, while others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- In many countries, people can eat a wide variety of food that are grown in other areas. As a result, they eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- In some cities, there are few controls over the design and construction of new homes and office buildings, so people can build in whatever style they like. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun want seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wants'.
Suggestion: many wants
...ific actions. In a psychological facet, many want to freely have a choice, yet punishing ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30670926518 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01039853874 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607028753994 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.976693748 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192429611916 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573174086087 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053018451046 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115592916435 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054414299066 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.