In many public places, the use of secret video cameras is being increased with the aim to reduce crime, but some people believe that this restricts individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased video secret security outweigh the drawbacks?
It is true that video surveillance has become popular in many cities nowadays due to the purpose of reducing crimes. However, some individuals argue that these solutions will create a restriction for personal privacy. This essay will illustrate both the pros and cons of surveillance cameras in public and express my personal view.
Increase of significant crimes in public places has become a controversial matter nowadays. Many crimes like kidnapping, drug dealings and murders are common in public places in recent years. I strongly agree that CCTV security camera system in the public is more useful for security departments in the country to find and recognize the crimes and the criminals who attempt to do. It is obvious that most of the shops and firms are being monitored by video recording system to reduce the shoplifting, as well as robberies and criminals, are less likely to commit crimes if they notice they are being watched. In addition, police departments find it easy to arrest the offenders without huge effort who are already committed to the crime in public places. Moreover, most of the crimes which happen in recently are solved and confirmed because of the secret video cameras which installed in the public places. For example, the terrorist attacks happen in Sri Lanka recently, security video cameras are directly useful for confirming and identifying the people who convict for the situation
On the other hand, the development of the surveillance camera system has some drawback as well. Many people find this as an uncomfortable situation when the recording of their every single movement is a restriction of their privacy and freedom of their life. At the same time, some pictures and scenes which are taken from CCTV are publishing and sharing on social networks can be inappropriate to the society.
In conclusion, my personal point is that Although, if there any potential drawback on security cameras in the public, they are useful for ensure the security of the citizens and always need to be encouraged to promote and installed in every nook and corner to protect the society
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face conversation will be a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what solutions can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 78
- Do you think that people who work online at home are more productive than office workers or the other way around Give reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging face to face conversation will be a thing of the past To what extent do you agree 79
- Nowadays in many families the grandparents are responsible for bringing up children Is it a good or bad development for grandparents Give your own opinion and examples 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1088, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the people who convict for the situation On the other hand, the development of th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y nook and corner to protect the society
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12643678161 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69070338893 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5551590917 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.230769231 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364496782051 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109747315127 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398057387832 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176223589104 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679925993232 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.