We can usually learn much more from people whose views we
share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Schools have been trying to facilitate a more interactive learning environment since it is believed that it provides a more effective learning environment. And debate classes have been established to facilitate this process. When we have a conversation with people who possess different ideas from us, we may be enlightened and our views may be broadened.
First of all, if we just share ideas with people who share similar thoughts, then we may be hindered from being refreshed, and our thoughts may be stagnated. However, by sharing ideas with people who have contradictory ideas, we may be refreshed because of the new possibilities we may discover from the interaction. For instance, an advocate of a free compulsory education may find some fallacies about the policy, such as limited funding, while talking to an advocate of noncompulsory education. On the other side, if the advocate of free compulsory education has limited interaction with people possessing opposing views, he or she will not be able to grasp the pitfalls of their argument. Rather, by talking to people with similar opinions, they might get blinded by their common idea because they only try to see the bright side. In this case, everybody getting a fair chance to study. Therefore, it is important that people share ideas with not only the proposition, but also the opposition.
However, this process of arguing and debating may cause stress which may debilitate the learning environment. Students may get discouraged and will lose the spirit to engage in learning. For example, if students debate whether climate warming is a serious problem and if a particular side has a much more organized and persuasive arguments, the students on the other side may not want to argue anymore because it is evident that they lost the debate. Therefore in some cases, sharing ideas with contradictory views may involve stress which leads to worse learning conditions.
In conclusion, sharing ideas helps you to think in a broader way and may enlighten you to think about new ideas which helps you to learn. Nevertheless, it also has some pitfalls that it may dishearten students to learn.
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 83
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 16
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely alig 83
- 68.A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partne 66
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company."When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benef 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t is evident that they lost the debate. Therefore in some cases, sharing ideas with contr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11581920904 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85926504497 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505649717514 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3868599449 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1875 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.21951772744 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188970808216 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065129549917 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724687087205 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119024946125 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643278306402 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.