These day people in some country are living in a "throw-away" society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away.
What are its causes and what are its problems? What could be done to address this issue?
It is irrefutable that in this ultramodern era, the lifestyle of people has been witnessing transition across the globe. In a few nations, the attitude of people are being changed towards the products, utilization of things for few time then it would become unused. This essay will discuss the impact of the reasons for this trend and propose a logical conclusion.
To embark, by stating the root cause of this phenomenon, the first and foremost one being materialistic approach among products and companies give advertisements on television, radio, and newspaper by which individuals become aware of items. As a consequence, they would like to purchase a new smart phone, a car as well as electronic gadgets. Furthermore, people love to adhere a new fashion in the market owing to this they spend money on unused products. As a ramification, it leads to financial crisis in a person’s life and reduces the growth of the family. Besides this, there are escalating the rubbish of items in cities.
Conversely, discussing the measure of this issue, the government could make stringent rules and regulation regarding the ads of products by which mind of citizens would not manipulate. Moreover, masses should understand the gravity of the situation about the difference between want and need because they will buy that thing which requires. Law and enforcement authority could spread awareness among people.
In the final analysis, the reflection exhibited to above statement leads to firmly assert that individuals should spend their money on proper way and learn financial management skill for developing their business if they will not act judiciously then it will lead to repercussion, which could turn out to be a recipe for disaster, waiting to happen in the year to come
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | ajendrapatel | 78 | view |
- The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behaviorTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates did their degree, and employer's reasons for hiring them.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 73
- The two floor plans show the renovation of AAA Accountancy's main office.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- These day people in some country are living in a "throw-away" society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are its causes and what are its problems? What could be done to address this issue? 78
- The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevantYou should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You should write 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, waiting to happen in the year to come
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, first, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19031141869 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91553652088 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60553633218 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.6940005277 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126749707801 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435935572855 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028737636218 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750285936835 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301662079277 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.