government should reduce investment
The importance of government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the government should increase their investment on medical technology. Consequently, they can provide the education for poor people because they can gain higher education in the future. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that the government should help the poor people and they gave to money for those people. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that the government should open the hospitals for poor individuals. Besides, education is more important for every person in the future and government should provide the more jobs for poor people. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2024-02-15 | Hasnain | 77 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal620 | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal Khalid | 80 | view |
- experiment learning is better than formal learning 77
- Technological access to online music and like should be free or paid. 77
- numerous prefer more fast food and snacks. 77
- large shopping malls are replacing smalls shops what is your opinion on this do you think this is a good or bad change 72
- sports and movies 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, however, so, thus, while, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19083969466 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68618784734 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4193608368 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298669345486 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104325000256 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116383353463 0.071462118173 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204229267626 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711281241616 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.