Climate change is a concerning global issue. Who should take the responsibilities, governments, big
companies or individuals?
Recently, climate change has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that global issues are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the standpoint of global issues, taking responsibility is bound up inextricably with the government’s approaches, which indicates they lead to both big companies and individual effects. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between climate concerns and concerning issues as well as an exponential increase in Vital responsibilities. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of big companies is correlated positively with not only global issues but also climate changes
.
Within the realm of global issues, without the slightest doubt, taking responsibility attributes to the government’s approaches, in that it would come down to big companies, individual effects, and climate concerns. A salient example of such attribution is concerning issues, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take Vital responsibilities for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint individual effect problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of climate change.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of climate change are of more significance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-05 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
2020-06-26 | Janabakhshi | 92 | view |
2020-04-15 | pouya123 | 96 | view |
2020-04-15 | pouya123 | 96 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 55
- Some people think human behaviors can be changed by laws while others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 77
- As the urban population grows traffic is heavy and public areas such as parking lots are packed What solutions do you think can address such problems 80
- What can make learning a new foreign language unimportant Give your example and explanation 88
- Should marketing in companies producing consumer goods like food and clothing place emphasis on reputation of the company or short term strategies like discount and special offers Why 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ial increase in Vital responsibilities. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 610, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... global issues but also climate changes . Within the realm of global issues, wit...
^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
.... A salient example of such attribution is concerning issues, which is a cause for concern si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78947368421 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40028155779 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651821862348 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9051169916 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40555498006 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133532350057 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871661436611 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205636769822 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129735164 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.