The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
The fast growth of technology combined with the higher demand of people in car ownership has lead to a dramatic increase in the number of vehicles on British road nowadays. Due to this situation, many individuals argue that there should be alternative transportation and laws also need to control car ownership. In my opinion, I tend to agree with this statement.
From the perspective of many individuals, car ownership may bring many benefits to their daily lives. First, having their own car may make them feel more comfortable and convenient. For example, people could use their own vehicle to drive to their home or their company in any time, in stead of waiting for a bus or train. Besides, having a car is also an common way for people to show off their wealth and boost their reputation. Many people spend a lot of money buying expensive cars which belong to famous brand such as BMW or Mercedes just to satisfy their demand.
However, on the other hand, car ownership may do more harm than good. The most serious consequence is that the more cars on streets, the higher amount of CO2 emissions in the atmosphere. As a result, this will lead to air pollution as well as global warming. Furthermore, owned car is also a key factor influencing the traffic congestion in big cities. The enormous number of cars on the roads make reduce the spaces for other vehicles and eventually cause serious congestions especially in rush hours.
In conclusion, I argue that it is necessary to control the fast increase of car ownership in this modern society due to its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Nhungvo3901 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | fatemeh fazli | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Sagar Gurung | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Ketan Raj Poudel | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-11 | thoaily | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny benefits to their daily lives. First, having their own car may make them feel ...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...heir home or their company in any time, in stead of waiting for a bus or train. Besides, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of waiting for a bus or train. Besides, having a car is also an common way for p...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...r train. Besides, having a car is also an common way for people to show off their...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as well as global warming. Furthermore, owned car is also a key factor influenci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, however, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78754578755 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68120358447 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1063762068 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3571428571 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264943253554 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914871216521 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768991010597 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159143911162 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073046250079 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.