People are using a lots of online language apps.do the benefit of this outweigh the disadvantage ?
In our contemporary society, various kinds of language applications have been used by human to communicating more easier with different languages. There are multi fold merits which are brought by these apps to facilitate people’s life. Personally I believed that the advantageous are outweighed drawbacks. In this essay I will put forth some reasons to support my view before arriving at conclusion.
First and foremost, although availability of numerous kinds of language applications and translators make people specially language student lazy, these apps have significant positive impact on human’s life in terms of tourism and traveling. Nowadays, with sophisticated modern language programs which can be installed easily in smart phones, tourists have traveled every country in the world without language barrier. A good illustration is some programs which have included 20 alive language in the world or google translate which they can translate every word and statement in a moment.
Secondly, despite the fact that English is the international language in every country, many people have had problem to learn it and use for their business. For employing a person in a company, a main barrier is made by a limitation in language understanding to choose the appropriate person. There many eligible and expert person with valuable experience whom can not speak another language efficiently. Thereby using app help these person to employ in multi language companies. Moreover, treading with many valid companies in various countries are made possible by language programs and it simplify global commerce.
Another compelling reason for proving the benefit of language app is usages for science. Not only can new knowledge be shared by these applications more simple with any foreigners, but also these programs can prevent from wasting time when using dictionaries for translating. The result is that in comparison previous ages scientific essays references and books are available for boosting technology and science.
In conclusion, given the above consideration, app translators are quick solution to getting best result. The benefits of modern apps language easily outweigh the disadvantageous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-17 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing . Do you think advantageous of this Development outweigh the disadvantageous ? 78
- Human beings do not need to eat meat in order to maintain good health because they can get all their food needs from meatless products and meatless substitutes A vegetation diet is as healthy as a diet containing meat Argue for or against the opinion abov 61
- In the Future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing . Do you think advantageous of this Development outweigh the disadvantageous ? 61
- Unemployment is one of the biggest problem of the contemporary society What do you think are the main cause of unemployment What solutions can you suggest 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ave been used by human to communicating more easier with different languages. There are mul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people specially language student lazy, these apps have significant positive imp...
^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rists have traveled every country in the world without language barrier. A good i...
^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understanding choosing'.
Suggestion: understanding choosing
...ier is made by a limitation in language understanding to choose the appropriate person. There many elig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this person' or 'these people', 'these persons'?
Suggestion: this person; these people; these persons
...age efficiently. Thereby using app help these person to employ in multi language companies. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'simplifies'?
Suggestion: simplifies
...de possible by language programs and it simplify global commerce. Another compelling r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for proving the benefit of language app is usages for science. Not only can new ...
^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'apps'' or 'app's'?
Suggestion: apps'; app's
...ing best result. The benefits of modern apps language easily outweigh the disadvant...
^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of modern apps language easily outweigh the disadvantageous.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60597014925 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00735861455 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602985074627 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2807739197 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.470588235 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239328616709 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865016456868 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700563295586 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143546326019 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425038989157 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.