It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. That money should be spent on building modern buildings instead.
Nowadays, preservation of the old instructors cost a significant amount of money. While some people have a conviction that this money would be spent to build modern infrastructures, I will elaborate in this essay why I am a strong oppose of this approach.
First and foremost, historic buildings in each place are representative of the culture of corresponding period. Many of them has been recorded in UNESCO since they are nations’ history. For instance, Isfahan is a cultural heritage of Iran and this fact is clearly visible from its stony constructions with magnificent paintings back to several centuries ago. Undoubtedly, the level of expenditures on restoring such buildings is high but it is worth. Furthermore, the tourism industry of some countries strongly attached to these memorable buildings so that they can make a lot of money which can be replaces in turns of the amount which has been spent.
Another vital fact that should be taken into consideration is that living in modern buildings equipped with modern facilities become an inevitable part of today’s life. Having access to the latest technologies such as automation lighting which most of the people are accustomed to use them, could be very deceptive. Moreover, applying such facilities for modern building with proper infrastructures would be far cheaper in terms of expenses such as disposal, reassembling the materials and consulting fee of the experts who should confirm the renewing the building. Therefore, economically it does not make sense.
On the basis of the point mentioned above, old monuments tell us about the history and we are not allowed to not maintain them with the excuse of waste of money. Even so, buildings that cannot be restored should be destroyed
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- TPO14 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Agree or Disagree: Asking children to work in a small group is the best way to teach young children 86
- dinosaurs were endotherm 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to using'.
Suggestion: accustomed to using
...n lighting which most of the people are accustomed to use them, could be very deceptive. Moreover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, even so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20070422535 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0225361137 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62323943662 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4437219815 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340372933623 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108512875349 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850148707421 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201870485142 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178610129372 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.