TPO 15 - integrated
Cane toads must be controlled by three methods
building a national fence
killing them
developing a disease-causing virus
The reading introduces some processes in order to stop the spread of cane toads in Australia and insists that these methods are useful. Nonetheless, the professor not only casts doubt on the methods mentioned by the author but also defends her hypothesis by three persuasive explanations. She thinks that these methods are unsuccessful and environmentally dangerous even though she accepts that getting rid of cane toads is not easy. The lecturer's perceptions, used to shed light on this controversial issue, are as the following.
First of all, the passage claims that constructing a national fence for preventing the toads' spread is a satisfactory idea. However, the educator overthrows this notion, mainly because she believes that this process will not stop young toads from spreding since they can commute through streams and rivers. Therefore, as rivers flow from one plcae to another, young toads, as well as their eggs, can stablish their population regardless of the fences.
Secondly, the author suggests that these toads can be killed voluntarily, but the professors completely disagrees with this idea insomuch as she declares young volunteers are mostly untrained and they may unintentionally destroy native frogs of Australia owing to the fact that they are pretty identical to cane toads especially the younger ones, and the volunteers cannot distinguish between them.
Third, the article upholds that developing a disease-causing virus would be useful for controling the cane toads' population. On the other hand, the teacher refutes this rationalization since she posits that this action will influence the ecosystem of the South America as a result of the fact that some reptiles are usually transformed between Australia and America. Accordingly, when these infected reptiles reach the America, their disease will attack king toads (native toads of The America) and devastate their situation. This action will damage their ecosystem as king toads, which are considered as a vital part of it, will be suffered from that virus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-23 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, well, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.409375 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85413454209 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565625 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.1885768031 49.2860985944 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.25 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06452816374 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439471423671 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151162991099 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871378414723 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248206976348 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600979204883 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.