The chart below give information about the highspeed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002.
The bar chart and table compare five different nations, namely South Korea, USA, Germany, Switzerland and Britain, in terms of the growth of the number of people using high-speed internet access in two consecutive years, from 2001 to 2002.
Generally, users applying high-speed internet connection in all countries experienced an increase and the biggest change occurred in Britain. In addition, South Korea and the USA had the quantity of families having a line of tall-speed internet was the highest.
In 2001, about 12,2% of South Korea households had access to high-speed internet, compared to 9,3% of US families. One year later, the number of US houses with high-speed internet soared by 170% and reached a peak of 25,11% of the population, which was the tallest figure of all measured territories for those years. By contrast, the developing rate was significantly lower in South Korea, at only 20%.
Regarding the remaining areas, there was only a very small difference between them, with only roughly 0.35% of households having a high-speed connection. Over the one year ensuing, all three lands witnessed notable rises. Details, Germany and Switzerland rose sharply by 80% and 120% respectively. However, it seems that Britain saw an explosion of high-speed internet usage, so the hugest change rate happened in here with a 230% increases.
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 84
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26388888889 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80125495466 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.961620452 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.7 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142455263071 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552442193762 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596177172136 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937755857091 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390183224267 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.