tpo35
The lecture and reading are both about Voynich"s manuscript, which book are resemble manuscript written in the fifteen and sixteenth centuries. The teacher says that the origin of theories, which are discussed in the reading, is not convenient for the folling reasons.
First of all, the issue of a manuscript as a genuine work. the lecturer states that this manuscript has important and powerful information. Also, it does not have any relation to the Asckem book because Voynich's book has plants subject. However, Asckem's book does not have these subjects. In addition, Asckem's book have no idea in his writing because he was a physician. On the other hand, reading opposes this concept.
Secondly, the trouble of the fake manuscript. The lecturer says that Voynich did not want to trick the people by writing a magical book and selling it to them. thus, the people at that time were easy thinking. He did not need to write with a complex idea like what happed in his manuscript. consequently, the passage argues with this concept.
Finally, the problem of modern fake. The professor asserts that This manuscript made from ink and velloum. These materials returned to 400 years ago. in addition, he says that from where Youag has ink because the age of ink 400 years. However, the author opposes this concept.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-08 | incoco | 90 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | rosray | 3 | view |
| 2020-02-09 | supergirl20 | view | |
| 2020-02-08 | farzaddanaeii | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | farzaddanaeii | 3 | view |
- do you believe that university students should consider taking a different subject such as technology science and engineering do you think that it will have benefits for student od no and explain why 60
- tpo35 3
- which is the most import quality for school projects creative cooperative organized 66
- TPO 05 3
- Tpo 27 Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ssue of a manuscript as a genuine work. the lecturer states that this manuscript ha...
^^^
Line 6, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... a magical book and selling it to them. thus, the people at that time were easy thin...
^^^^
Line 6, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...dea like what happed in his manuscript. consequently, the passage argues with this concept. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...se materials returned to 400 years ago. in addition, he says that from where Youag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00904977376 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59424041516 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561085972851 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8832928584 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.5 110.228320801 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.2777777778 21.698381199 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.3589403974 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.89 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.