People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Protecting the ecosystem is the authorities' top priority mission these days. While other people think that raising taxes on petrol is the most effective solution, I would argue that there are other better ways to combat the issue.
To begin with, fuel being inceased in cost alone does not bring huge changes in the usage of cars and other fuel-based vehicles. At recent, there are little choice of transport so people have to drive their personal vehicles for daily activities. If the cost goes up, they still do not have alternative transport and keep using petrol-based ones. Moreover, in some countries lacking of developed public transport system and citizens continue to travel by private cars, when the fuel fee rises, they are forced to spend more money on it and reduce budget for other eco-friendly products such as glass containers or cloth bags and using free plastic insted which is another pressing pollution.
In addition, the government should invest more money to upgrade the public transport provision which plays a pivotal role in tackling the problem. As the service on buses and underground trains does not meet the standard quality, people are less willing to try public vehicles. For example, in comparison with Vietnam, australia has a more efficient transport system that becomes an indispensable part of people life. Thus, the quantity of private cars and motors dramatically decline. The air quality in australia is much fresher and safter for its netizens thanks to the fact that less vihicles produce less gases and traffic congestion occuring as well.
In conclusion, the idea of raising fuel cost is not suitable for today situation and improving public transport quality is considered to be more effective. The national authorities should allocate more fund in traffic in order to preserve the planet's environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-15 | Sanaullah97 | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | Le Trang | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | myduyen282 | 67 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 87
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- IELTS Writing Task 1 Percentages of Sodium Saturated Fats Sugars in Meals 68
- Some people say that schools should be closed amid an outbreak of the disease To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed which is another pressing pollution. In addition, the government should inves...
^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun gases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... to the fact that less vihicles produce less gases and traffic congestion occuring a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd traffic congestion occuring as well. In conclusion, the idea of raising fuel ...
^^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...und in traffic in order to preserve the planets environment.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19397993311 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62458074116 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5777238841 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240277127493 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728653900707 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442296583251 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127978799004 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218111467557 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.