The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare the percentage of energy generation coming from five different resources in France over the course of 10 years starting from 1995.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that Coal and Gas were still the two main sources over the period shown. Additionally, while the proportion of energy produced from Coal, Gas, Nuclear and Other origins increased, the opposite was true for Petrol.
In 1995, about 89% of the total energy was manufactured by Gas, Coal and Petro. Meanwhile, Nuclear and Other resources only contributed a small part in the sum energy manufactured, with 6.4% and 4.9% respectively.
Over the decade ensuing, the rate of energy made from Coal and Gas experienced an insignificant growth, to 30.93% and 30.30% sequentially. Similarly, Nuclear and Other resources also saw an upward trend, with 10.10% for Nuclear and 9.10% for the other one.
By contrast, the figure contributing to the whole energy generated for Petro decreased significantly by approximately 10%, to 19.55%.
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other part of lives Unfortunately not many achieve this balance What are the problems of this Suggest some solutions to solve the problem 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 83
- The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 2008 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, similarly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2743902439 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90568454533 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.8862245272 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.125 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996850809914 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498232236412 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470328319322 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657460831509 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487043585173 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.