The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015.
The bar chart compares how many passengers participating in three different public transportation in Somewhere city between 2012 and 2015.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the amount of resident used a tram increased over the period shown, while the other transport experienced a strong fluctuation.
In 2012, the train was the most popular way to move, at about 80,000, compared to around 55,000 people chose to go to by bus. By contrast, the tram was the least common, just nearly 20,000 passengers using this type of vehicle.
Over the three years ensuing, an upward trend happening in the number of commuters by the tram made it becoming the most familiar form of transport, at approximately 95,000 in 2015. Meanwhile, the amount of customers using the train recovered at over 62,000 after hitting the lowest point of about 10,000 residents in 2013. Similarly, the figure for the bus reached a peak of almost 70,000 users in 2014 before falling to roughly 60,000 clients.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | amritkumar | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | Fara Has | view | |
| 2021-06-22 | dinhthu05 | view | |
| 2020-09-18 | nagakhoa | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-02 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 89
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 89
- Average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person, 1967-2007 73
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02409638554 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69087693819 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674698795181 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7385755119 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174598810111 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868116505824 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952099575137 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126958120705 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104611201394 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.