The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
The offered line graph depicts the ratio of the increasing population of the age 65 and beyond over the century in three major nations; Japan, Sweden and the USA.
In general, Sweden and the USA had a similar trend in the increasing population during the initial and termination point, however before reaching the end it had opposite movement. Japan, on the contrary, had the downfall in a population that later managed to pick up after the mid-period, and in the end, it had a dramatic increase in population.
In the initial year (1940) the population of Sweden and the USA was around 7 and 9 per cent respectively which with certain fluctuation increased to 15 and 14 per cent after forty years. Then the population stabilised in the USA and it is predicted to be at the same pace till the end of 2018. The population will then surge significantly to around 24 per cent in the end.
Whereas, in the case of the USA, the initial population was 5 per cent which had a slight downfall till 1960. Later the population stabilised and few years after 1980 the ratio then increased gradually till 2020, which will rise continuously until early 2030. After the year, the percentage skyrocketed to 25 which will have a slight increase since.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | nguyenhnil | 67 | view |
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon and shows two possible sites for a new supermarket. 73
- PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION OF ELECTRICITY IN 2014 IELTS 13 TEST 3 90
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7465437788 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69131525694 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502304147465 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1510966139 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12308106637 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588218991212 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682131732755 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987190806235 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086872287009 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.