To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
In recent years, a heated discussion about whether the quality of tertiary education can be improved by raising salaries of professors. My perspective is that higher salaries could be a strong incentive to professors, thus they may make every effort to get the job.
Firstly, an increase in salary can appeal to more talents with profound academic knowledge to choose this profession. To be more specific, it is in human being’s nature to make more money. professors also have the desire for higher salary. As is shown in a survey, majority of teachers claim that they prefer working with a competitive salary.
Therefore, universities which lavish professors with high payment tend to recruit teachers owning a lot of knowledge in this field. As a consequence, the beneficial effect of teaching will be produced, and the quality of education will be raised.
Secondly, a higher income also plays a significant role after introducing fully-fledged professors. Initially, provided that professors are rendered high salaries, they can get rid of daily trifles in lives through purchasing advanced home appliances sold at exorbitant price, or hiring others to tackle housework, instead of being obstructed by these household chores. Hence, more time could be available for them to delve into education. professors can discover the shortages in teaching and compensate them by absorbing new pedagogical methods, then make progress in teaching.
Thirdly, in order to get the higher quality of education than before, teachers need to take courses of teaching methods which require quite a lot of fees. Only professors who receive a high salary could afford these courses. Imagine a stingy university which does not pay professors a lot, teachers may be lack of opportunities to take courses and have no idea improving themselves with a pittance.
Nevertheless, it is worthless for professors who are enjoying the high salary before to enhance the quality of education by increasing the payment. Under this circumstance, universities ought to spur teachers for the further education of teaching. also, more practices should be given to these professors.
All in all, I stand for the idea that higher salaries could make great contribution to the quality of education, due to the attraction of new teachers, the support for senior professors and opportunities for courses of teaching skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professors
...uman being’s nature to make more money. professors also have the desire for higher salary....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 441, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professors
...lable for them to delve into education. professors can discover the shortages in teaching ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... for the further education of teaching. also, more practices should be given to thes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97200999753 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542328042328 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3237762775 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.842105263 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255569045267 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074949122031 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575054091558 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13225383624 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725808414736 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.